Mar 30, 2010
University Of Colorado Supports Violence Towards Gay & Lesbian Students-Claims Homo’s Are Diseased Pedo’s Recruiting Kids
The University of Colorado in Colorado Springs (UCCS) recently ran an article comparing Gay Americans to diseased pedophiles recruiting children. It is unfortunate that an institute as prestigious as the University of Colorado has given in to the influences of registered christian hate groups such as:
Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH) – Calls for the extermination of all Gays and Lesbians as an abomination before god. AFTAH is a registered hate group that promotes putting all Gays and Lesbians to death.
Family Research Institute (FRI) – Promotes the forehead branding and forced exile of HIV positive Gay Americans. FRI is a registered hate group based in Colorado Springs.
Focus On The Family (FOTF) – Claims that homosexuals are made by child molestation and recruitment by Gay and Lesbian teachers. FOTF helped found the Traditional Values Coalition a registered hate group. Focus on the Family is based in Colorado Springs.
The University of Colorado in Colorado Springs (UCCS) has fallen under the influence of so many Southern Poverty Law Center registered hate groups.
Is it wrong and discriminatory for the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) to implement a ban on homosexual men donating blood? A square and firm “No” is my logical response.
According to a Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study in 2007, there were a total of 1,017,859 people in the United States with the AIDS virus. Of that number, 487,695 had contracted the virus through male-to-male sexual intercourse. That means that in 2007, 47.9 percent of all AIDS cases were contracted as a result of male-to-male contact; and even more simply put, nearly half of all AIDS cases in 2007 were a result of male-to-male homosexual acts.
Given those numbers and facts, to immediately assume that the government is discriminating against the homosexual community by not allowing gay men to donate blood is nothing short of irresponsible and close-minded.
The fact of the matter is that just about half of all AIDS carriers in 2007 were a result of homosexual acts; it would be negligent and destructive in the utmost sense of the words to allow homosexual men to freely donate blood to people who are in desperate need of it. If the very idea of donating blood is to improve the health of someone else, then is allowing homosexual men, who are at a disproportionately great risk of having AIDS, to donate a good idea? Absolutely not.
In fact, this issue seems like another case of common sense made complicated. This has absolutely nothing to do with discrimination against sexual orientation, and everything about knowing for a fact that AIDS is a deadly virus and that those who receive blood donated from homosexual men carry a more substantial risk of contracting said virus.
Just to heighten the simplicity of this matter: Should a parent allow a registered sex offender to babysit their children for a weekend? (and no, I’m not suggesting gay men are sex offenders; this analogy is about probability, so hear me out) A “yes” to this answer would be more than appropriate for those who would argue that banning homosexual men from donating blood is discriminatory and wrong. There is not a 100 percent chance that said sex offender will sexually abuse said children during the weekend [a Gay or Lesbian would], but there is a much better chance than there would be with a non-offender [a straight].
So is there a 100 percent chance that someone will contract the AIDS virus from receiving blood from a homosexual male donor? Of course not. But are the chances higher? You bet. The numbers are there for you to check out whenever you want: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/basic.htm#aidsrace.
The FDA’s overall intention is to establish proper health precautions within the United States in order to decrease health risks to its citizens, and I further believe that the banning action in reference is maintaining good faith of this aforementioned intention.
This entire hate article was written by a registered christian hate group such as the Family Research Institute and published by their student tool to promote violence and discrimination against Gays and Lesbians.
The article is a complete lie, the American blood supply is screened for HIV. Obviously the author’s intent was simply to promote violence towards Gay and Lesbian Students.
The University of Colorado must shut down their violent death campus in Colorado Springs before some Gay or Lesbian student is executed!
If you are a Gay or Lesbian student leave the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs (UCCS) immediately. Parents, do not send your Gay or Lesbian children to this hate filled campus of the University of Colorado.
Just ran across your post and wanted to correct the following statement:
This entire hate article was written by a registered christian hate group such as the Family Research Institute and published by their student tool to promote violence and discrimination against Gays and Lesbians.
The article was actually written by a UCCS student representing his opinion in the official student newspaper at UCCS. The student newspaper nor the University of Colorado is a “hate group.” Actually, both the student body president and vice president are openly gay members of the community. The student newspaper is not a tool to spread hate, it is a mere representation of differing student opinion’s on campus. While it may be hateful, by spreading hate and lies such as you are doing here, you are only hurting the cause you represent.
Be proactive in your articles so that you do not mislead others.
I am assuming that the editor of this student newspaper would have enough common sense not to run a racist opinion piece. Why then did the editor feel that a blatantly homophobic opinion piece would be fine?
The FDA bans blood donations from men who have sex with men. Most Gays happen to fall under that umbrella but so do many straights. It is an unnecessary ban because all blood is tested for HIV.
If the article had said black men cannot donate blood would the article been approved? Of course not.
This article was simply pandering to the many hate groups that call Colorado Springs home. The language was inflammatory and the article very poorly researched.
The article associates Gays with disease and pedophilia, a common hate tactic to promote discrimination and violence against the Gay and Lesbian community.
[...] back into the closet. These christian terror groups are using everything from open death threats to opinion pieces in student newspapers that promote discrimination and violence against Gay and Lesbian [...]
[...] to terrorize other openly Gay student leaders in universities around the country. This includes the well publicized threats of violence against the Gay student body president of the University of Colorado in Colorado [...]